Benchmarking, ethical alignment, and evaluation framework for conversational AI: Advancing responsible development of ChatGPT

Partha Pratim Ray

57 citations0/0 files storedBenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Topic Modeling Speech and dialogue systems

Abstract

Conversational AI systems like ChatGPT have seen remarkable advancements in recent years, revolutionizing human–computer interactions. However, evaluating the performance and ethical implications of these systems remains a challenge. This paper delves into the creation of rigorous benchmarks, adaptable standards, and an intelligent evaluation methodology tailored specifically for ChatGPT. We meticulously analyze several prominent benchmarks, including GLUE, SuperGLUE, SQuAD, CoQA, Persona-Chat, DSTC, BIG-Bench, HELM and MMLU illuminating their strengths and limitations. This paper also scrutinizes the existing standards set by OpenAI, IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design, the Montreal Declaration, and Partnership on AI’s Tenets, investigating their relevance to ChatGPT. Further, we propose adaptive standards that encapsulate ethical considerations, context adaptability, and community involvement. In terms of evaluation, we explore traditional methods like BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, precision–recall, F1 score, perplexity, and user feedback, while also proposing a novel evaluation approach that harnesses the power of reinforcement learning. Our proposed evaluation framework is multidimensional, incorporating task-specific, real-world application, and multi-turn dialogue benchmarks. We perform feasibility analysis, SWOT analysis and adaptability analysis of the proposed framework. The framework highlights the significance of user feedback, integrating it as a core component of evaluation alongside subjective assessments and interactive evaluation sessions. By amalgamating these elements, this paper contributes to the development of a comprehensive evaluation framework that fosters responsible and impactful advancement in the field of conversational AI.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

References

2023ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendation 2023Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review

Cited by

2024Ethical dimensions of generative AI: a cross-domain analysis using machine learning structural topic modeling 2024Exploring Biases of Large Language Models in the Field of Mental Health: Comparative Questionnaire Study of the Effect of Gender and Sexual Orientation in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa Case Vignettes 2025Accelerating Digital Mental Health: The Society of Digital Psychiatry’s Three-Pronged Road Map for Education, Digital Navigators, and AI

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.