SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
16 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods (2023)Missing values and inconclusive results i…Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: A methodological review and classification scheme (2021)Study designs for comparative…Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research (2020)Adherence to the Standards fo…Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Diagnostic test evaluation me…Concerns about composite reference standards in diagnostic research (2018)Concerns about composite refe…A Bayesian hierarchical model for network meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests (2017)A Bayesian hierarchical model…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies (2016)Anticipating missing referenc…Understanding the Direction of Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2013)Understanding the Direction o…Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review (2013)Latent Class Models in Diagno…Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results (2013)Diagnostic accuracy studies: …A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013)A systematic review classifie…Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies (2012)Use of 3x2 tables with an int…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard (2009)A review of solutions for dia…Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods (2007)Evaluation of diagnostic test…Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results (1987)Intermediate, Indeterminate, …QUADAS-3 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2026)QUADAS-3 Explanation and Elab…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Development of practical recommendations for diagnostic accuracy studies in low-prevalence situations (2019)Recognising Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests Part 1: Patient Selection (2019)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II) (2018)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R (2018)Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Radiology: How to Recognize and Address Potential Sources of Bias (2021)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research (1995)Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing (2014)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering (2009)International Organization for Standardization (2011)Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018)Exploratory Latent Structure Analysis Using Both Identifiable and Unidentifiable Models (1974)Latent Class Analysis (1987)STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models (2017)What Is the Optimal Cut-Off Point of the 10-Item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Screening Depression Among Chinese Individuals Aged 45 and Over? An Exploration Using Latent Profile Analysis (2022)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard – a comparison of correction methods (2021)Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Understanding meta‐analysis (2023)The meaning of kappa: Probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited (1996)Evaluating Bias and Variability in Diagnostic Test Reports (1999)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,564 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods524 cited
  • 2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard404 cited
  • 2013A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies283 cited
  • 2013Understanding the Direction of Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy243 cited
  • 2019Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update220 cited
  • 2013Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review217 cited
  • 2012Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies176 cited
  • 1987Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results159 cited
  • 2013Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results142 cited
  • 2018Concerns about composite reference standards in diagnostic research51 cited
  • 2016Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

50 cited
  • 2017A Bayesian hierarchical model for network meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests45 cited
  • 2021Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: A methodological review and classification scheme43 cited
  • 2020Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research35 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2026QUADAS-3 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies8 cited