SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The systematic literature review process: a simple guide for public health and allied health students
16 references·0 citing·48 second hopsampled
The systematic literature review process: a simple guide for public health and allied health students (2023)The systematic literature review process:…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)SANRA—a scale for the quality…A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data (2019)A step by step guide for cond…What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Introduction to systematic re…How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)How to Do a Systematic Review…Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)Guidance on Conducting a Syst…When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist (2016)When and how to update system…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Development of a critical app…Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Standards for Reporting Quali…Critical appraisal tools (2014)Critical appraisal toolsConsolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions (2004)A Process for Systematically …Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Thematic Analysis (2017)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing (2017)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. (2020)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications (2018)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)Health Measurement Scales (2008)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care: An Updated Analysis of the Literature (2021)What is the role of eco-labels for a circular economy? A rapid review of the literature (2021)Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review (2023)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2014Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research12,156 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews5,174 cited
  • 2017Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review3,449 cited
  • 2019SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles3,386 cited
  • 2018How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses2,546 cited
  • 2016Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)2,368 cited
  • 2004A Process for Systematically Reviewing the Literature: Providing the Research Evidence for Public Health Nursing Interventions2,115 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences1,160 cited
  • 2019A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data813 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis633 cited
  • 2016When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist424 cited
  • 2014Critical appraisal tools417 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.