SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
¿Cuántos Tipos de Revisiones de la Literatura Existen? Enumeración, Descripción y Clasificación. Revisión Cualitativa
16 references·1 citing·40 second hopsampled
¿Cuántos Tipos de Revisiones de la Literatura Existen? Enumeración, Descripción y Clasificación. Revisión Cualitativa (2023)¿Cuántos Tipos de Revisiones de la Litera…Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)Reporting guideline for overv…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)How to Do a Systematic Review…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Synthesizing information syst…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Methodology in conducting a s…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The integrative review: updat…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Analyzing the Past to Prepare…Avances y desafíos éticos en la integración de la IA en la producción científica (2023)Avances y desafíos éticos en …Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable (1992)Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data (1999)Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2 (2001)Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification (2014)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2005The integrative review: updated methodology10,189 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2002Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review7,440 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews5,174 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 2018How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses2,546 cited
  • 2014Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews1,903 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,160 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,061 cited
  • 2022Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement849 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Avances y desafíos éticos en la integración de la IA en la producción científica18 cited