SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report (2023)Comparing the prevalence of statistical r…Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Replicability, Robustness, an…Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research (2021)Methodological quality of COV…Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Waste in covid-19 researchThe carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (2020)The carnage of substandard re…Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat? (2020)Scientists are drowning in CO…Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical …How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns (2020)How scientific research react…COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)COVID-19 research: pandemic v…Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Comparing quality of reportin…The GRIM Test (2016)The GRIM TestThe prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The prevalence of statistical…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals (2011)The (mis)reporting of statist…The American Psychological Association (1919)The American Psychological As…The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)Sample Size, Statistical Power, and False Conclusions in Infant Looking‐Time Research (2017)What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Human Error (1990)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon (2013)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review (2020)Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making (2021)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health (2021)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)A systematic scoping review of research on COVID ‐19 impacts on eating disorders: A critical appraisal of the evidence and recommendations for the field (2021)Circadian disturbances, sleep difficulties and the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker’s mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)A power primer. (1992)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Self-determination and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: Cross-national and longitudinal perspectives (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research (2001)What is resilience? A review and concept analysis (2010)The Psychological Distance of Climate Change (2011)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 1919The American Psychological Association7,475 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 2021Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science769 cited
  • 2015The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)510 cited
  • 2011The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals356 cited
  • 2020Waste in covid-19 research330 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19268 cited
  • 2021Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research189 cited
  • 2020The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality177 cited
  • 2020Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat?156 cited
  • 2020How scientific research reacts to international public health emergencies: a global analysis of response patterns156 cited
  • 2020Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

146 cited
  • 2020COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”130 cited
  • 2016The GRIM Test127 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.