SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome
5 references·0 citing·29 second hopsampled
Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome (2023)Risk of bias assessment tool for systemat…Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework (2019)Causes of reporting bias: a t…Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals (2016)Publication Bias and Nonrepor…The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2014)The Need for Randomization in…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)2009 Updated Method Guideline…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording (2015)How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards (2016)RandoMice, a novel, user-friendly randomization tool in animal research (2020)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)YOGA FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS (2013)A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus (2014)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain (2017)A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research (2021)Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)Dissecting the social on the principles of analytical sociology (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016)A randomized trial of an editorial intervention to reduce spin in the abstract’s conclusion of manuscripts showed no significant effect (2020)Replication Research Series-Paper 2 : Empirical research must be replicated before its findings can be trusted (2020)Evaluation of spin in reviews of biodegradable balloon spacers for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 20092009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group1,663 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2014The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews294 cited
  • 2016Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals76 cited
  • 2019Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework36 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work