SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Replication of systematic reviews: is it to the benefit or detriment of methodological quality?
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Replication of systematic reviews: is it to the benefit or detriment of methodological quality? (2023)Replication of systematic reviews: is it …When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist (2020)When to replicate systematic …Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Discrepancies in meta-analyse…Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2018)Replication, Duplication, and…Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review (2018)Methodological quality assess…Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2017)Overlapping network meta-anal…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews? (2015)Disorganized Systematic Revie…An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review (2015)An Assessment of the Methodol…Publish or perish: Where are we heading? (2014)Publish or perish: Where are …A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture (2014)A Case Study of Discordant Ov…Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Overlapping meta-analyses on …Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)The quality of reports of cri…A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature (2005)A systematic evaluation of th…We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research (2010)Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review (2018)The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials (2019)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy (2009)Compared with what? An analysis of control‐group types in Cochrane and Campbell reviews of psychosocial treatment efficacy with substance use disorders (2014)Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index (2019)The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review (2023)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Epistemonikos: a comprehensive database of systematic reviews for health decision-making (2020)Reproducibility of real-world evidence studies using clinical practice data to inform regulatory and coverage decisions (2022)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,287 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,207 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2014Publish or perish: Where are we heading?386 cited
  • 2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies252 cited
  • 2005A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature144 cited
  • 2007The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal*112 cited
  • 2020When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist110 cited
  • 2018Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses73 cited
  • 2017Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies68 cited
  • 2014A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture60 cited
  • 2015Disorganized Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Time to Systematize the Conduct and Publication of These Study Overviews?58 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study
41 cited
  • 2018Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review39 cited
  • 2015An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review38 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.