SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Impact of publisher's commercial or non‐profit orientation on editorial practices: Moving towards a more strategic approach to supporting editorial staff
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Impact of publisher's commercial or non‐profit orientation on editorial practices: Moving towards a more strategic approach to supporting editorial staff (2023)Impact of publisher's commercial or non‐p…Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects (2021)Overburdening of peer reviewe…Open Access and the Serials Crisis: The Role of Academic Libraries (2020)Open Access and the Serials C…How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)How is open access accused of…Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2019)Journal editors’ perspectives…Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Article Processing Charge Hyp…Are scientific editors reliable gatekeepers of the publication process? (2019)Are scientific editors reliab…Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research (2017)Untangling Academic Publishin…Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building (2017)Finding Theory–Method Fit: A …Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement (2017)Core competencies for scienti…A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals (2016)A scoping review of competenc…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The publishing delay in schol…Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research (2013)Purposeful Sampling for Quali…Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 (2012)Changing publication patterns…Scholarly Publishing (2009)Scholarly PublishingThe business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing (2008)The business of academic publ…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)Prominent but Less Productive (2016)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position – A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff (2015)Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities (2016)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (1987)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research (2019)Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples (2020)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Bowing before Dual Gods: How Structured Flexibility Sustains Organizational Hybridity (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice (2019)What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? (2021)AMA manual of style: a guide for authors and editors (2007)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2017)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The state of the art in peer review (2018)Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage (2024)A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems (2010)The poverty of journal publishing (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research13,558 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2017Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building1,216 cited
  • 2013The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals432 cited
  • 2012Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009224 cited
  • 2017Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research217 cited
  • 2019Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis176 cited
  • 2008The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing164 cited
  • 2020How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing128 cited
  • 2017Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement82 cited
  • 2021Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects73 cited
  • 2019Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study69 cited
  • 2009Scholarly Publishing58 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals46 cited
  • 2020Open Access and the Serials Crisis: The Role of Academic Libraries31 cited
  • 2019Are scientific editors reliable gatekeepers of the publication process?28 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.