SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Development of Standards for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation Health Sciences Research
10 references·1 citing·43 second hop
Systematic Development of Standards for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation Health Sciences Research (2023)Systematic Development of Standards for M…Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies (2020)Methodological Rigor in Mixed…Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Journal article reporting sta…Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT ) (2018)Improving the usefulness of a…Phenomenology of Practice (2016)Phenomenology of PracticeStandards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Standards for Reporting Quali…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Designing and Conducting Mixe…Phenomenological research methods (1994)Phenomenological research met…A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Implementation Outcomes of a Self-Regulation Strategy for Health Education: Perspectives of Clinicians and Older Adults With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury (2025)A Mixed Methods Evaluation of…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing (2017)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Editorial: Journal article reporting standards. (2018)Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting (2023)Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a values-based approach (2024)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods (2019)Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews (2020)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2010)Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology (2021)Mixed-methods research in applied linguistics: Charting the progress through the second decade of the twenty-first century (2023)The mediating role of attitude towards the technology in shaping artificial intelligence usage among professionals (2025)Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry (2000)From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not (2006)Qualitative Research Designs (2007)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)Bridging the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems1 (2013)A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research (2021)Changing Behavior Using the Health Action Process Approach (2020)Changing Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases (2020)Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research23,260 cited
  • 1994Phenomenological research methods13,881 cited
  • 2014Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research12,156 cited
  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,521 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
  • 2018Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.2,279 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2018Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT )1,080 cited
  • 2016Phenomenology of Practice571 cited
  • 2020Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies304 cited

Cited by

  • 2025A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Implementation Outcomes of a Self-Regulation Strategy for Health Education: Perspectives of Clinicians and Older Adults With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work