SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers
0 references·5 citing·20 second hop
Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers (2023)Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT…Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing (2025)Negotiating identity in the a…What if ChatGPT generates quantitative research data? A case study in tourism (2024)What if ChatGPT generates qua…Towards replicability and sustainability in cancer research (2024)Towards replicability and sus…Recent trends: Retractions of articles in the oncology field (2024)Recent trends: Retractions of…‘As of my last knowledge update’: How is content generated by ChatGPT infiltrating scientific papers published in premier journals? (2024)‘As of my last knowledge upda…The Satisfaction With Life Scale (1985)Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects (1986)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)The impact of digital transformation practices in the recreation sector on digital behavior decision-making post-COVID-19 (2024)Retraction rates are on the rise (2008)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)Analysis of Retracted Publications on Artificial Intelligence: Trends, Ethical Concerns, and Scientific Integrity (2025)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR) (2021)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)AI-Generated “Slop” in Online Biomedical Science Educational Videos: Mixed Methods Study of Prevalence, Characteristics, and Hazards to Learners and Teachers (2025)Responsible use of AI in social science research (2025)Science sleuths flag hundreds of papers that use AI without disclosing it (2025)Thematic Analysis (2022)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2024‘As of my last knowledge update’: How is content generated by ChatGPT infiltrating scientific papers published in premier journals?29 cited
  • 2024What if ChatGPT generates quantitative research data? A case study in tourism17 cited
  • 2025Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing17 cited
  • 2024Recent trends: Retractions of articles in the oncology field16 cited
  • 2024Towards replicability and sustainability in cancer research8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work