SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Current Situation of MDPI Publications ? Findings from the EU-27 Member States
12 references·0 citing·51 second hop
The Current Situation of MDPI Publications ? Findings from the EU-27 Member States (2023)The Current Situation of MDPI Publication…Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary (2022)Understanding the increasing …Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017 (2018)Evolution of the scholarly me…Open-access mega-journals (2017)Open-access mega-journalsOpen access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities) (2017)Open access megajournals: The…Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations) (2017)Open access megajournals: The…Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology (2017)Last and corresponding author…Bite-size research: BMC Research Notes goes back to its roots (2017)Bite-size research: BMC Resea…“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals (2017)“Let the community decide”? T…Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference? (2016)Peer review in megajournals c…Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile (2016)Open-Access Mega-Journals: A …Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth? (2015)Have the “mega-journals” reac…A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals (2014)A survey of authors publishin…A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals (2018)Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation (2019)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Developing an effective market for Open A APC (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)“Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence (2017)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Scientific peer review (2011)Bias in peer review (2012)Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals (2018)Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey (2019)Innovative Strategies for Peer Review (2020)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Anatomy of green open access (2013)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network (2018)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact (2009)Promoting an open research culture (2015)The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism (2019)The troubles of high-profile open access megajournals (2019)Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach (2022)Productivity and Impact of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-Related Academic Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (2023)Peer Review in the Age of Generative AI (2024)Open Access (2012)Adoption of the Open Access Business Model in Scientific Journal Publishing: A Cross-disciplinary Study (2020)The Rapid Growth of Mega-Journals (2023)When Authorship Fails (1997)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Female citation impact superiority 1996–2018 in six out of seven English‐speaking nations (2019)Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution (2019)Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology (2019)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)(Mis-)Classification of 17,721 Journals by an Artificial Intelligence Predatory Journal Detector (2023)The unprincipled principal: how Romania’s inconsistent research reform impacted scientific output (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?151 cited
  • 2017Open-access mega-journals138 cited
  • 2016Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile89 cited
  • 2014A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals84 cited
  • 2018Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–201766 cited
  • 2017Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology66 cited
  • 2017“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals59 cited
  • 2016Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?56 cited
  • 2022Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary42 cited
  • 2017Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)26 cited
  • 2017Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)24 cited
  • 2017Bite-size research: BMC Research Notes goes back to its roots9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work