SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Accuracy of scite, a Smart Citation Index
10 references·2 citing·46 second hop
Evaluating the Accuracy of scite, a Smart Citation Index (2023)Evaluating the Accuracy of scite, a Smart…Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)Using artificial intelligence…Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews (2022)Retracted publications in pha…Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol (2022)Automation of literature scre…scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning (2021)scite: A smart citation index…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach (2017)Identifying reports of random…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)RobotReviewer: evaluation of …Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited (2004)Citation Analysis and Discour…Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts (2024)Enhancing the quality and eff…The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses (2023)The relationship between meth…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence on (Digital) Public Services Co-Creation (2021)SYMBALS: A Systematic Review Methodology Blending Active Learning and Snowballing (2021)Methods for using Bing's AI‐powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review (2023)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Increased Amygdala and Insula Activation During Emotion Processing in Anxiety-Prone Subjects (2007)A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: an overview of empirical studies (2021)Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices (2024)How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools (2024)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)New evidence pyramid (2016)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)A4SLR: An Agentic Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Systematic Literature Review Framework to Augment Evidence Synthesis for Health Economics and Outcomes Research and Health Technology Assessment (2025)Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations (2023)Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)School Closures During Social Lockdown and Mental Health, Health Behaviors, and Well-being Among Children and Adolescents During the First COVID-19 Wave (2022)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof‐of‐concept study (2024)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Automatic classification of citation function (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018 (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches691 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis647 cited
  • 2015RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials316 cited
  • 2004Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited265 cited
  • 2022Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review250 cited
  • 2017Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach188 cited
  • 2021scite: A smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning158 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews106 cited
  • 2022Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol44 cited
  • 2022Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews34 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Enhancing the quality and efficiency of regulatory science literature reviews through innovation and collaboration with library and information science experts5 cited
  • 2023The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work