SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study
16 references·6 citing·42 second hop
An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study (2023)An Automated Literature Review Tool (Lite…Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Automation of systematic lite…An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)An open source machine learni…Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Software tools to support tit…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)A full systematic review was …Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? (2019)A question of trust: can we b…Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Automating data extraction in…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review (2026)The landscape of artificial i…Scrutinizing English Academic Writing Skills: Indonesian Postgraduate Students' Challenges and Strategies in an AI-Empowered Era (2025)Scrutinizing English Academic…LitOrganizer: Automating the process of data extraction and organization for scientific literature reviews (2025)LitOrganizer: Automating the …Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review (2025)Large language models for con…Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)Towards the automation of sys…The impact of performance appraisal methods on enterprises in the Internet era (2024)The impact of performance app…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? (2023)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,343 cited
  • 2021An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews1,237 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches691 cited
  • 2020A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study688 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements599 cited
  • 2021Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review494 cited
  • 2020Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation458 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2015Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

305 cited
  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)201 cited
  • 2019A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?179 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use—a scoping review191 cited
    • 2024Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review122 cited
    • 2025LitOrganizer: Automating the process of data extraction and organization for scientific literature reviews11 cited
    • 2026The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review10 cited
    • 2025Scrutinizing English Academic Writing Skills: Indonesian Postgraduate Students' Challenges and Strategies in an AI-Empowered Era5 cited
    • 2024The impact of performance appraisal methods on enterprises in the Internet era1 cited