SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Artificial Intelligence is Irreversibly Bound to Academic Publishing — ChatGPT is Cleared for Scientific Writing and Peer Review
5 references·1 citing·21 second hop
Artificial Intelligence is Irreversibly Bound to Academic Publishing — ChatGPT is Cleared for Scientific Writing and Peer Review (2023)Artificial Intelligence is Irreversibly B…The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. (2023)The role of ChatGPT in scient…Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch — but is it any good? (2023)Scientists used ChatGPT to ge…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications (2023)Chatbots, generative AI, and …Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts (2023)Chatbots, Generative AI, and …Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing (2025)Negotiating identity in the a…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing (2023)CSP em 40 anos de publicação científica (2024)Thematic Analysis (2022)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)Facilitator or thinking inhibitor: understanding the role of ChatGPT-generated written corrective feedback in language learning (2024)The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Research Integrity in Scholarly Publishing (2024)Writing without borders: AI and cross-cultural convergence in academic writing quality (2025)AI vs academia: Experimental study on AI text detectors’ accuracy in behavioral health academic writing (2024)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Defining the Boundaries of AI Use in Scientific Writing: A Comparative Review of Editorial Policies (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.289 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2023Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch — but is it any good?63 cited
  • 2023Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications59 cited
  • 2023Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts24 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: non-native English researchers’ experiences with AI-assisted academic writing17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work