SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, 1975–2021. A systematic review
11 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, 1975–2021. A systematic review (2023)Statistical inference and effect measures…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…A review of high impact journals found that misinterpretation of non-statistically significant results from randomized trials was common (2022)A review of high impact journ…Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975–2014: a systematic review (2016)Statistical inference in abst…Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Evolution of Reporting P Valu…Odds ratio vs risk ratio in randomized controlled trials (2015)Odds ratio vs risk ratio in r…Potential Misinterpretation of Treatment Effects Due to Use of Odds Ratios and Logistic Regression in Randomized Controlled Trials (2011)Potential Misinterpretation o…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Reporting Number Needed to Treat and Absolute Risk Reduction in Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Reporting Number Needed to Tr…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Better reporting of randomise…Down with odds ratios! (1996)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses (2000)Intervention effectiveness among war‐affected children: A cluster randomized controlled trial on improving mental health (2012)Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio “portable” in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial (2000)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review (2006)Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations (2007)Delivery of Evidence-Based Treatment for Multiple Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses (2008)Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials (2018)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Current use of effect size or confidence interval analyses in clinical and biomedical research (2021)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Statistical Inference in Abstracts Published in Cardiovascular Journals (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on the Impact of Formative Assessment on K-12 Students’ Learning: Toward Sustainable Quality Education (2024)The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024)The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
  • 2016Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015370 cited
  • 2002Reporting Number Needed to Treat and Absolute Risk Reduction in Randomized Controlled Trials239 cited
  • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews163 cited
  • 2011Potential Misinterpretation of Treatment Effects Due to Use of Odds Ratios and Logistic Regression in Randomized Controlled Trials63 cited
  • 2016Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975–2014: a systematic review38 cited
  • 2015Odds ratio vs risk ratio in randomized controlled trials31 cited
  • 2022A review of high impact journals found that misinterpretation of non-statistically significant results from randomized trials was common29 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work