The Prevalence of Sexual Assault Among Higher Education Students: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses

Bridget Steele · Mackenzie Martin · G. J. Meléndez‐Torres · Michelle Degli Esposti · David K. Humphreys

76 citations0/0 files storedTrauma Violence & Abuse

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Gender, Security, and Conflict

Abstract

Sexual assault among higher education students has detrimental impacts on the health and educational outcomes of survivors. This systematic review aims to describe and synthesize the available quantitative evidence on sexual assault prevalence among this population. We searched Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ERIC, and CINAHL for studies published in English, French, Italian, and Spanish from database inception to August 2020 (updated May 2022). We screened studies using prespecified inclusion criteria for the population and context (registered higher education students), condition (self-reported sexual assault), and study design (quantitative survey). The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess study quality. Prevalence estimates disaggregated by type of sexual assault, gender identity, and world region were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and reported following PRISMA guidance. We identified 131 articles, from 21 different countries. The meta-analyzed prevalence of sexual assault was 17.5% for women, 7.8% for men, and 18.1% for transgender and gender diverse people. Four types of sexual assault were identified: rape, attempted rape, forced sexual touching, and coercive sex. Forced sexual touching was the most common act experienced. The African Region had the highest prevalence estimates for women's sexual assault, and the Western Pacific region had the highest prevalence estimates for men's sexual assault. Higher education institutions, especially those outside of the United States, should commit to the implementation of surveys to monitor sexual assault prevalence and dedicate increased resources to supporting student survivors of sexual assault.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package 2013Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.2015Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data 2002Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability 2016Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis 1985Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity.

Cited by

2025Sexual Violence and Shame: A Meta-Analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.