SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses (2023)The relationship between methodological q…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019 (2021)Nearly 80 systematic reviews …Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Searching for and selecting s…Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Post retraction citations in …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Why articles are retracted: a…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)The Retraction Penalty: Evide…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate (2002)Systematic Research Synthesis…What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model (1989)What do citations count? the …Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations (1985)Private acts and public objec…Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations (1975)Some Results on the Function …Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? (1975)Content Analysis of Reference…Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism (1951)Main Trends in Recent Philoso…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces' mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol (2025)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism (1999)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The “Panglossian paradigm” defended (1983)The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction (1993)Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward (2016)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,744 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews4,191 cited
  • 1951Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism3,043 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,282 cited
  • 1975Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations697 cited
  • 2019Searching for and selecting studies651 cited
  • 1975Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting?364 cited
  • 2021Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019285 cited
  • 1989What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model276 cited
  • 1985Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations256 cited
  • 2016Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central212 cited
  • 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

191 cited
  • 2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
  • 2002Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate167 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.