SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations
16 references·1 citing·36 second hop
A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations (2023)A systematic review of retractions in bio…Reform retractions to make them more transparent (2020)Reform retractions to make th…The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)The limitations of retraction…Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement (2018)Integrity of Authorship and P…The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies (2017)The (ir)rational consideratio…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2013)Research Misconduct in Low- a…Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: A concern (2013)Fraud and misconduct in clini…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? (2011)Retractions in the medical li…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)Retractions in the research l…Research Misconduct: The Poisoning of the Well (2006)Research Misconduct: The Pois…Publish or Perish (2005)Publish or PerishThe Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)The Continued Use of Retracte…Over two decades of scientific misconduct in India: Retraction reasons and journal quality among inter-country and intra-country institutional collaboration (2024)Over two decades of scientifi…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Exploratory Research (2020)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination (1989)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices (2005)The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital Research (2008)Maturation of Corporate Governance Research, 1993–2007: An Assessment (2009)Management control systems and research management in universities (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Human Error (1990)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Ethics in engineering practice and research (2012)Policy Response, Social Media and Science Journalism for the Sustainability of the Public Health System Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Vietnam Lessons (2020)Alice in Suicideland: Exploring the Suicidal Ideation Mechanism through the Sense of Connectedness and Help-Seeking Behaviors (2021)A New Theory of Serendipity: Nature, Emergence and Mechanism (2022)Bosses without a heart: socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward Emotional AI in the workplace (2021)Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2017The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies1,347 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2020Reform retractions to make them more transparent1,075 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2005Publish or Perish371 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?216 cited
  • 1990The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature188 cited
  • 2006Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?161 cited
  • 2013Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries159 cited
  • 2011Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?156 cited
  • 2019The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019126 cited
  • 2006Research Misconduct: The Poisoning of the Well85 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013
Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: A concern
67 cited
  • 2018Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement67 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Over two decades of scientific misconduct in India: Retraction reasons and journal quality among inter-country and intra-country institutional collaboration18 cited