SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Content and quality of YouTube regarding women’s health: a scoping review
13 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Content and quality of YouTube regarding women’s health: a scoping review (2023)Content and quality of YouTube regarding …Examination of Information and Misinformation about Urinary Tract Infections on TikTok and YouTube (2022)Examination of Information an…“YouTube™ as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis” (2022)“YouTube™ as a source of info…YouTube as a source of information during the Covid-19 pandemic: a content analysis of YouTube videos published during January to March 2020 (2021)YouTube as a source of inform…Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on female urinary incontinence (2021)Evaluation of quality and rel…College Students’ Digital Media Preferences for future HPV Vaccine Campaigns (2021)College Students’ Digital Med…Healthcare information on YouTube: Pregnancy and COVID‐19 (2020)Healthcare information on You…Analysis of the Most Viewed First 50 Videos on YouTube about Breast Cancer (2020)Analysis of the Most Viewed F…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review (2014)Healthcare information on You…When Vaccines Go Viral: An Analysis of HPV Vaccine Coverage on YouTube (2011)When Vaccines Go Viral: An An…Social Networks Lack Useful Content for Incontinence (2011)Social Networks Lack Useful C…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model (1974)Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007)A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior (2010)HPV Vaccine Information in the Blogosphere: How Positive and Negative Blogs Influence Vaccine-Related Risk Perceptions, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intentions (2012)Misleading Health-Related Information Promoted Through Video-Based Social Media: Anorexia on YouTube (2013)Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them (2018)Online Professionalism and the Mirror of Social Media (2010)YouTube as a Source of Information on Kidney Stone Disease (2010)YouTube As a Source of Information on the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic (2010)Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists (2014)Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neurogenic bladder and intermittent catheterization (2015)Fake News: Spread of Misinformation about Urological Conditions on Social Media (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome? (2015)Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015–16 Zika virus pandemic (2018)Health anxiety and behavioural changes of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review (2021)The causes, impacts and countermeasures of COVID-19 “Infodemic”: A systematic review using narrative synthesis (2021)YouTube as a source of information about COVID-19 for children: Content quality, reliability, and audience participation analysis (2021)YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information (2009)YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call? (2012)Is Content Really King? An Objective Analysis of the Public's Response to Medical Videos on YouTube (2013)YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet’s disease: a reliability and quality analysis (2021)Assessment of the Medical Reliability of Videos on Social Media: Detailed Analysis of the Quality and Usability of Four Social Media Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube) (2022)Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms (2022)YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? (2020)A content analysis of the reliability and quality of Youtube videos as a source of information on health-related post-COVID pain (2022)Quality and Reliability of YouTube Video Contents About Sports Mouthguards: A Cross‐Sectional Study (2024)Quality of information in osteoporosis videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional study (2025)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media (2019)The Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Quality Health Information on Varicoceles (2022)A Social Media Quality Review of Popular Sinusitis Videos on TikTok (2024)An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok (2024)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube (2018)The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on food priorities. Results from a preliminary study using social media and an online survey with Spanish consumers (2020)Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2014Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review1,290 cited
  • 2011When Vaccines Go Viral: An Analysis of HPV Vaccine Coverage on YouTube381 cited
  • 2020Healthcare information on YouTube: Pregnancy and COVID‐1987 cited
  • 2011Social Networks Lack Useful Content for Incontinence82 cited
  • 2020Analysis of the Most Viewed First 50 Videos on YouTube about Breast Cancer80 cited
  • 2021YouTube as a source of information during the Covid-19 pandemic: a content analysis of YouTube videos published during January to March 202051 cited
  • 2022Examination of Information and Misinformation about Urinary Tract Infections on TikTok and YouTube50 cited
  • 2021College Students’ Digital Media Preferences for future HPV Vaccine Campaigns34 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on female urinary incontinence25 cited
  • 2022“YouTube™ as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis”23 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work