No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract Western thought has been dominated by the dichotomy of traditional religion and secular atheism. But do we have to choose between these options? Philip Goff argues that it is time to move on from both God and atheism. Through an exploration of contemporary cosmology, as well as cutting-edge philosophical research on the nature of consciousness, Goff argues for cosmic purpose: the idea that the universe is directed towards certain goals, such as the emergence of intelligent life. However, in contrast to religious thinkers, Goff argues that the Omni-God (defined as all-knowing, all-powerful, and perfectly good) is a bad explanation of cosmic purpose. Instead, we explore a range of alternative possibilities for accounting for cosmic purpose. Perhaps our universe was created by an evil or morally indifferent designer, or a designer with limited abilities. Perhaps we live in a computer simulation. Maybe cosmic purpose is rooted not in a conscious mind but in natural tendencies towards the good, or laws of nature with purposes built into them. Or maybe the universe is itself a conscious mind which directs itself towards certain goals. Goff scrutinises these options with analytic rigour, laying the groundwork for a new paradigm of philosophical enquiry into the middle ground between God and atheism. The final chapter outlines a way of living in hope that cosmic purpose is still unfolding, involving political engagement and a non-literalist interpretation of traditional religion.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 112 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.