Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Leveraging AI for democratic discourse: Chat interventions can improve online political conversations at scale

16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2019Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations7,086 cited
2017Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases2,845 cited
2004Why Deliberative Democracy?2,661 cited
2018Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization1,860 cited
2006Hearing the Other Side1,685 cited
2002Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice1,066 cited
2017Human Decisions and Machine Predictions1,039 cited
2020Political sectarianism in America928 cited
2018The contact hypothesis re-evaluated868 cited
2016Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing794 cited
2023Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples774 cited
2003Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index722 cited
2016The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry710 cited
2020Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges684 cited
2017Human Decisions and Machine Predictions545 cited
2019Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: implications for health systems

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

532 cited

Cited by

2024AI can help people feel heard, but an AI label diminishes this impact244 cited
2024Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties32 cited
2025Artificial Intelligence in deliberation: The AI penalty and the emergence of a new deliberative divide27 cited
2023Exploring the Early Adoption of Open AI among Laypeople and Technical Professionals: An Analysis of Twitter Conversations on #ChatGPT and #GPT322 cited
2026The impact of generative AI on social media: an experimental study21 cited
2025Why Do You Feel That Way? Elaboration Questions and Feeling Heard in Political Talk19 cited
2026A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science19 cited
2025Natural language processing for social science research: A comprehensive review18 cited
2024Generative AI and the Future of Democratic Citizenship18 cited
2024Generative AI for Pro-Democracy Platforms17 cited
2025The impact of advanced AI systems on democracy17 cited
2024People who share encounters with racism are silenced online by humans and machines, but a guideline-reframing intervention holds promise17 cited
2024Attraction to politically extreme users on social media15 cited
2024Political biases and inconsistencies in bilingual GPT models—the cases of the U.S. and China13 cited
2025Balancing Large Language Model Alignment and Algorithmic Fidelity in Social Science Research12 cited
2024AI Within Online Discussions: Rational, Civil, Privileged?12 cited