SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion
16 references·0 citing·27 second hop
Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbeing in AI Ethics Standards: A Scoping Review and Discussion (2023)Anthropocentrism and Environmental Wellbe…Understanding Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Safety: A Guide for the Responsible Design and Implementation of AI Systems in the Public Sector (2020)Understanding Artificial Inte…The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An E…Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI (2020)Principled Artificial Intelli…The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The global landscape of AI et…Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Principles alone cannot guara…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)AI4People—An Ethical Framewor…Understanding scoping reviews (2016)Understanding scoping reviewsGuidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature (2010)Using scoping literature revi…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…On Being Morally Considerable (1978)On Being Morally ConsiderableAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework (2021)Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks (2014)Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education (2020)Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2022)Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review (2022)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Embodied Conversational Agents in Clinical Psychology: A Scoping Review (2017)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2019The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines6,172 cited
  • 2018AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations4,732 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2020The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines1,900 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,889 cited
  • 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI1,869 cited
  • 2020Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI998 cited
  • 2016Understanding scoping reviews740 cited
  • 1978On Being Morally Considerable647 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010
Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature
357 cited
  • 2020Understanding Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Safety: A Guide for the Responsible Design and Implementation of AI Systems in the Public Sector315 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.