New public management and aquatic and recreation centre planning and decision-making processes

Abstract

Rationale/Purpose: The purpose of the study was to explore how new public management (NPM) components influence the planning and decision-making of local government aquatic and recreation centre (ARCs) development.Methodology: Two case studies were conducted in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia.Data collection comprised documents (n = 264) and semi-structured interviews (n = 19) to understand the real-life experiences of people involved in ARC planning and decision-making.Deductive analysis was used to identify how NPM components influenced the ARC planning and decision-making process.Findings: ARC planners were primarily driven by financial outputs.Results identified four of the seven NPM components are active in the planning and decision-making across both cases.These include management skills, output controls, creating competition and resource efficiency.Practical implications: From a theoretical perspective, the findings suggest that resource efficiency decisions were prioritised in the ARC decisionmaking process.Local governments need to consider their motivations towards achieving financial efficiencies and the subsequent impacts on ARC provision.This approach influences local governments' capacity to address social planning objectives.Research contribution: Local governments in Melbourne, Australia employ NPM principles in their ARC planning and decision-making practices.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.