SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Automated interpretation of comparison scores for firearm toolmarks on cartridge case primers
10 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Automated interpretation of comparison scores for firearm toolmarks on cartridge case primers (2023)Automated interpretation of comparison sc…Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV (2021)Measuring calibration of like…Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer‐based comparisons (2020)Firearm examination: Examiner…Comparison and interpretation of impressed marks left by a firearm on cartridge cases – Towards an operational implementation of a likelihood ratio based technique (2020)Comparison and interpretation…Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners (2019)Validity and reliability of f…Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate (2016)Special issue on measuring an…Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating? (2016)Numerical likelihood ratios o…Automatic Comparison and Evaluation of Impressions Left by a Firearm on Fired Cartridge Cases (2014)Automatic Comparison and Eval…A consistent test of independence based on a sign covariance related to Kendall’s tau (2014)A consistent test of independ…Information‐Theoretical Assessment of the Performance of Likelihood Ratio Computation Methods (2013)Information‐Theoretical Asses…Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists (1996)Statistics and the evaluation…The Comparison and Evaluation of Forecasters (1983)Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation (2007)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge (2015)An inter-laboratory evaluation of LA-ICP-MS analysis of glass and the use of a database for the interpretation of glass evidence (2018)Consecutive Matching Striation Criteria: A General Critique (2000)Defending the Scientific Foundations of the Firearms and Tool Mark Identification Discipline: Responding to Recent Challenges (2007)Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives (2022)The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION (1938)An Introduction to Copulas (1999)Learning to Predict Citation-Based Impact Measures (2017)Statistical Dependence: Beyond Pearson’s ρ (2022)On relationships between Chatterjee’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients (2024)The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion (2009)ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science (2015)An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence (2016)On the likelihood of “encapsulating all uncertainty” (2016)Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence (2020)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Interpretation of chemical data from glass analysis for forensic purposes (2020)An interlaboratory study evaluating the interpretation of forensic glass evidence using refractive index measurements and elemental composition (2021)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. (1993)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive (2020)Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions (2020)Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners (2022)Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States (2003)Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2019–2022 (2022)An overview of log likelihood ratio cost in forensic science – Where is it used and what values can we expect? (2024)Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980 (1982)Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners (2023)Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons (2024)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Embracing likelihood ratios and highlighting the principles of forensic interpretation (2021)Testing for Calibration Discrepancy of Reported Likelihood Ratios in Forensic Science (2021)From data to a validated score-based LR system: A practitioner’s guide (2024)How Many Samples from a Drug Seizure Need to Be Analyzed? (2001)The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014A consistent test of independence based on a sign covariance related to Kendall’s tau150 cited
  • 2013Information‐Theoretical Assessment of the Performance of Likelihood Ratio Computation Methods102 cited
  • 2016Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating?56 cited
  • 2014Automatic Comparison and Evaluation of Impressions Left by a Firearm on Fired Cartridge Cases55 cited
  • 2019Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners53 cited
  • 2016Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate41 cited
  • 1996Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists26 cited
  • 2020Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer‐based comparisons24 cited
  • 2020Comparison and interpretation of impressed marks left by a firearm on cartridge cases – Towards an operational implementation of a likelihood ratio based technique21 cited
  • 2021Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work