SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Article retraction rates in selected MeSH term categories in PubMed published between 2010 and 2020
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Article retraction rates in selected MeSH term categories in PubMed published between 2010 and 2020 (2023)Article retraction rates in selected MeSH…The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (2020)The carnage of substandard re…An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (2020)An alarming retraction rate f…Science of science (2018)Science of scienceModelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Modelling science trustworthi…Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Post retraction citations in …Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Why articles are retracted: a…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)The Retraction Penalty: Evide…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud (2011)The MMR vaccine and autism: S…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018)Exploratory Research (2020)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The natural selection of bad science (2016)Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association (1999)Time Trends in Autism and in MMR Immunization Coverage in California (2001)How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed (2011)How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation (2011)Misinformation on vaccination: A quantitative analysis of YouTube videos (2018)Fake science and the knowledge crisis: ignorance can be fatal (2019)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Medical disinformation and the unviable nature of COVID-19 conspiracy theories (2021)Interventions to reduce partisan animosity (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,210 cited
  • 2018Science of science1,494 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,236 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?423 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature362 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 2011The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud261 cited
  • 2018Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure225 cited
  • 2016Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central212 cited
  • 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science191 cited
  • 2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
  • 2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
  • 2020The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

177 cited
  • 2020An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)157 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.