SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Interpret Effect Sizes for Biopsychosocial Outcomes and Implications for Current Research
12 references·0 citing·42 second hop
How to Interpret Effect Sizes for Biopsychosocial Outcomes and Implications for Current Research (2023)How to Interpret Effect Sizes for Biopsyc…Who should judge treatment effects as unimportant? (2023)Who should judge treatment ef…All MCIDs Are Wrong, But Some May be Useful (2022)All MCIDs Are Wrong, But Some…Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology (2021)Empirically derived guideline…The influence of nonnormality from primary studies on the standardized mean difference in meta-analysis (2020)The influence of nonnormality…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes (2007)Effect sizes, confidence inte…Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size. (2001)Review of assumptions and pro…A Critique and Improvement of the CL Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong (2000)A Critique and Improvement of…A Critique and Improvement of the "CL" Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong (2000)A Critique and Improvement of…Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. (1998)Fixed- and random-effects mod…A power primer. (1992)A power primer.Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators (1981)Distribution Theory for Glass…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research (2005)Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review (2009)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. (1982)Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (2003)A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. (2008)An Improved Effect Size for Single-Case Research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs (2008)Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion (2021)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)The neuropsychology of borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis and review (2005)Effect magnitude: A different focus (2006)Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes (2007)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. (2010)Academic Benefits of Peer Tutoring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Single-Case Research (2013)Tourism and Economic Growth: A Meta-regression Analysis (2019)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Is Your Accent Right for the Job? A Meta-Analysis on Accent Bias in Hiring Decisions (2022)Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size (2024)Effect sizes for nonparametric tests (2025)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. (2002)Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration1 (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reading and Writing Interventions for Students with Disorders of Intellectual Development (2021)Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study (2023)The normality assumption on between-study random effects was questionable in a considerable number of Cochrane meta-analyses (2023)Spartan: A Comprehensive Tool for Understanding Uncertainty in Simulations of Biological Systems (2013)Validity assessment of the symptom checklist SCL-90-R and shortened versions for the general population in Ukraine (2016)What is wrong with topic modeling? And how to fix it using search-based software engineering (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A power primer.42,571 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 1981Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators5,682 cited
  • 1998Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.2,976 cited
  • 2000A Critique and Improvement of the CL Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong1,162 cited
  • 2000A Critique and Improvement of the "CL" Common Language Effect Size Statistics of McGraw and Wong830 cited
  • 2021Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology636 cited
  • 2007Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes387 cited
  • 2001Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size.104 cited
  • 2020The influence of nonnormality from primary studies on the standardized mean difference in meta-analysis35 cited
  • 2022All MCIDs Are Wrong, But Some May be Useful34 cited
  • 2023Who should judge treatment effects as unimportant?32 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work