SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The spreading information of YouTube videos on Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a worrisome picture from one of the most consulted internet source
11 references·0 citing·30 second hop
The spreading information of YouTube videos on Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a worrisome picture from one of the most consulted internet source (2023)The spreading information of YouTube vide…YouTube is inadequate as an information source on delayed ejaculation (2022)YouTube is inadequate as an i…Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information? (2022)Testicular pain and youtube™:…Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform? (2022)Testicular cancer and YouTube…Looking for cystoscopy on YouTube: Are videos a reliable information tool for internet users? (2022)Looking for cystoscopy on You…Could YouTubeTM encourage men on prostate checks? A contemporary analysis (2022)Could YouTubeTM encourage men…Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis (2022)Analysis of quality informati…YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis (2021)YouTube as a source of inform…Is social media reliable as a source of information on Peyronie’s disease treatment? (2021)Is social media reliable as a…YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment (2019)YouTube as a Source of Inform…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)YouTube as a Source of Information on Kidney Stone Disease (2010)YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call? (2012)Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review (2018)Quality of English‐language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus (2020)Quality of YouTube Videos on Meningioma Treatment Using the DISCERN Instrument (2021)Cross‐sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok (2022)Assessing the Credibility of the “YouTube Approach” to Health Information on Acute Myocardial Infarction (2012)Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube (2018)Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube (2018)Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction (2020)Personal protective equipment in Covid-19: Evidence-based quality and analysis of YouTube videos after one year of pandemic (2021)Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Education for Patients Undergoing Surgery (2023)Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube (2020)Immunotherapy for Urological Tumors on YouTubeTM: An Information-Quality Analysis (2022)Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025)YouTubeTM as a source of information on bladder pain syndrome: A contemporary analysis (2021)Mental Health of Prostate Cancer Patients: Content Review on YouTubeTM (2023)A Content Analysis of YouTube™ Videos Related to Prostate Cancer (2016)Are dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos (2023)“YouTube™ as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis” (2022)YouTube™ as a source of information on prostatitis: a quality and reliability analysis (2023)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2019YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment91 cited
  • 2022Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform?43 cited
  • 2021YouTube as a source of information on penile prosthesis36 cited
  • 2022Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on Phimosis30 cited
  • 2022Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information?29 cited
  • 2022Looking for cystoscopy on YouTube: Are videos a reliable information tool for internet users?25 cited
  • 2022Could YouTubeTM encourage men on prostate checks? A contemporary analysis18 cited
  • 2021Is social media reliable as a source of information on Peyronie’s disease treatment?17 cited
  • 2022YouTube is inadequate as an information source on delayed ejaculation13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work