SMEs and patents: Is it worth it? A longitudinal analysis of the patent-performance relationship

Abstract

In response to scepticism about the benefits of patenting in small firms, this paper provides new evidence on the relationship between financial performance in SMEs and patents, distinguishing between applications and granted patents. Empirical analyses show that firms with a patent application still pending five years after the filing date report higher sales than comparable firms who have not filed. Yet, we also find that the monopoly rights attached to granted patents do not result in higher sales than simply filing for a patent. This analysis leads us to infer that the activities performed during the patent application process improve firm knowledge stocks and absorptive capacity, in turn promoting performance above and beyond the status quo. SME managers should find in this study solid empirical evidence supporting well-informed decision-making over patenting.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.