Articlehybrid2023

Village Owned Enterprises Governance (BUMDes) Based on the Tourism Village Development

Erika Revida · Rizabuana Ismail · Prihatin Lumbanraja · Sri Alem Br. Sembiring · Sukarman Purba

11 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Local Governance and Development Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability Regional Development and Management Studies

Abstract

Tourism villages are suspected of having broad and multiplier effects on the lives of rural communities, including reducing poverty, preventing urbanisation, namely the movement of people from villages to cities, reducing unemployment, increasing the income of rural communities, regions and even countries, preserving the environment, culture local and love the motherland more.To such an extent the positive impact of tourism villages on rural communities has resulted in the attention of the government of the Republic of Indonesia currently being increasingly focused and intense on the development of tourist villages, both in the form of programs and activities as well as allocation of village funds, especially for the development of tourist villages.This study analyses the village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) based on the tourism village development in Samosir North Sumatera.The technique of data analysis used multiple regression analysis.The research result showed that there was a significant and positive contribution between the village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) on the tourism village development in Samosir North Sumatera.There was a contribution between the openness village-owned enterprises model, the transparency village-owned enterprises, accountability village-owned enterprises, fairness village-owned enterprises, independent village-owned enterprises (BUMDes) on the tourism village development in Samosir North Sumatera.The new findings of this research based on the interviews conducted were in addition to governance of openness, transparency, accountability, fairness.The new findings of this research were participation, entrepreneurial, and social capital governance.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research 2013Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages 2014Corporate Governance, Responsible Managerial Behavior, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Organizational Efficiency Versus Organizational Legitimacy?2007Leadership and fairness: The state of the art 2014The Demand and Need for Transparency and Disclosure in Corporate Governance 2008Rebuilding Stakeholder Trust in Business: An Examination of Principle‐Centered Leadership and Organizational Transparency in Corporate Governance1 2021A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia 2017The Need for Dual Openness to Change: A Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Impact of Employees’ Openness to Organizational Change Content and Process on Intervention Outcomes

Cited by

2025Collaborative Rural Governance Strategy to Enhance Rural Economy Through Village-Owned Enterprise Using Soft System Methodology 2025Accountability, transparency, social innovation and performance: a village-owned enterprise perspective in an emerging country

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.