The European Court of Justice’s Case Law on Freedom to Provide Services: Is Keck Relevant?

Abstract

Abstract For a long time the conventional view had it that the interpretation of the basic freedoms should follow different lines:1 whereas Article 28 (ex 30) EC—the free movement of goods—was to be considered as a far-reaching prohibition of any measures restricting the import of goods, whether indistinctly applicable or not, the provisions on the free movement of persons—workers, establishment and services—were regarded as a mere expression of the general principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality as set forth in Article 12 (ex 6) EC.2

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.