Moral Particularism

Unknown author

169 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Ethics and Theory Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Abstract

Abstract Moral particularism is currently one of the most widely discussed-and hotly contested-issues in ethical theory. Spurred in large part by reactions to the writings of John McDowell and Jonathan Dancy, philosophers continue to divide between those who find particularism’s claims insightful and those who find them exaggerated or wrong-headed. Indeed, philosophers continue to divide over how best to interpret what claims ‘moral particularism’ is meant to represent in the first place. In this collection, we present a dozen new essays by theorists who take up the controversy.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 169 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006A Core Precautionary Principle*2005?Ideal Theory? as Ideology 2008Intuition, Inference, and Rational Disagreement in Ethics 2006Aristotle's Ethical Treatises 2011RULES AND REASONS IN THE THEORY OF PRECEDENT 2004Minimalism and the Value of Truth 2006Particularism and the Classification and Reclassification of Moral Cases 2010Holism, Weight, and Undercutting

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.