Scientific Controversies

Unknown author

64 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally it has been thought that scientific controversies can always be resolved on the basis of empirical data. Recently, however, social constructionists have claimed that the outcome of scientific debates is strongly influenced by non-evidential factors such as the rhetorical prowess and professional clout of the participants. This volume of previously unpublished essays by well-known philosophers of science presents historical studies and philosophical analyses that undermine the plausibility of an extreme social constructionist perspective while also indicating the need for a richer and more realistic account of scientific rationality.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 64 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013Methodological Issues in Science Education Research: A Perspective from the Philosophy of Science 2020Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda 1995A Pragmatic Framework for the Evaluation of Policy Arguments 2012VALUES IN SCIENCE 2020How Are Biology Concepts Used and Transformed?2006Descartes’s changing mind 2007Animal Electricity at the End of the Eighteenth Century: The Many Facets of a Great Scientific Controversy 2020Is It Possible to Scientifically Reconstruct the History of Life on Earth?

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.