SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving trustworthiness in research in Women's Health: A collective effort by OBGYN Editors
16 references·2 citing·45 second hop
Improving trustworthiness in research in Women's Health: A collective effort by OBGYN Editors (2023)Improving trustworthiness in research in …Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review (2023)Research integrity in randomi…International multi‐stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity (2023)International multi‐stakehold…Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)Checklist to assess Trustwort…Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Identifying and managing prob…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: obstetrical journal guidelines (2021)Quality criteria for randomiz…Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Methods to assess research mi…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future (2020)Retracted articles in the obs…Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions (2020)Integrity of randomized contr…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction (2019)Toward fulfilling the aspirat…Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology (2019)Plagiarism and data falsifica…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidCONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Guidelines for retracting articles (2009)Guidelines for retracting art…Trustworthiness criteria for meta‐analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines (2024)Trustworthiness criteria for …Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN journal guidelines (2024)Trustworthiness criteria for …GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses (2014)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review (2020)Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers (2021)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool (2022)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2) versus the original RoB: A perspective on the pros and cons (2024)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd Edition) (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study (2025)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review (2023)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases (2021)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews8,092 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,812 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,422 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,412 cited
  • 2009Guidelines for retracting articles185 cited
  • 2023Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot154 cited
  • 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
  • 2022Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis90 cited
  • 2021Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review68 cited
  • 2020Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future54 cited
  • 2020Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions49 cited
  • 2023International multi‐stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity29 cited
  • 2019Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2023Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review24 cited
  • 2021Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: obstetrical journal guidelines22 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Trustworthiness criteria for meta‐analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines6 cited
    • 2024Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN journal guidelines6 cited