Legal regulation of generative AI: a multidimensional construction

Jian Li · Xintong Cai · Le Cheng

23 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Legal Discourse

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digitalization, Law, and Regulation Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

Abstract

Abstract The technological adoption and widespread use of generative AI, as represented by ChatGPT, have altered the conventional mode of interaction between humans and AI and profoundly changed the way our society operates. In response to the multifarious risks associated with generative AI, spanning ethical considerations, intellectual property protection, privacy and data protection, market monopoly, cybercrime, and data security concerns, discussions on the status of AI subjects and legal regulation have surfaced both on a global and domestic scale. It is argued in the present study that generative AI governance should uphold the principle of reconciling safety and development, craft an AI code of ethics in line with the umbrella of the human-centered principle, and promote a comprehensive legal framework of AI based on general AI legislation, supplemented by specialized management approaches for generative AI, and underpinned by established legal norms.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

2019The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines 2016Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': The US, EU, and UK Approach 2019Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor 2020AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings 2023A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education 2019Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings 2020AI ethics should not remain toothless! A call to bring back the teeth of ethics 2016On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy

Cited by

2024Ethical considerations related to personal data collection and reuse: trust and transparency in language and speech technologies 2024How Digital Power Shapes the Rule of Law: The Logic and Mission of Digital Rule of Law 2024Identifying stance in legislative discourse: a corpus-driven study of data protection laws 2025Generative AI and digital resilience: a research agenda

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.