SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in regional anesthesia and pain medicine (Part I): guidelines for preparing the review protocol
16 references·4 citing·32 second hop
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in regional anesthesia and pain medicine (Part I): guidelines for preparing the review protocol (2023)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in r…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020)Synthesis without meta-analys…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkm…Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Recommendations for examining…GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating th…A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Human versus artificial intelligence: evaluating ChatGPT’s performance in conducting published systematic reviews with meta-analysis in chronic pain research (2025)Human versus artificial intel…Evaluating the utility of large language models in generating search strings for systematic reviews in anesthesiology: a comparative analysis of top-ranked journals (2025)Evaluating the utility of lar…Narrative reviews in anesthesia and pain medicine: guidelines for producers, reviewers and consumers (2024)Narrative reviews in anesthes…Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Part II): Guidelines for Performing the Systematic Review (2023)Systematic Reviews and Meta-a…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis (2013)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2020Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline4,561 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
  • 2014The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method2,401 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Human versus artificial intelligence: evaluating ChatGPT’s performance in conducting published systematic reviews with meta-analysis in chronic pain research26 cited
    • 2023Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Part II): Guidelines for Performing the Systematic Review23 cited
    • 2024Narrative reviews in anesthesia and pain medicine: guidelines for producers, reviewers and consumers18 cited
    • 2025Evaluating the utility of large language models in generating search strings for systematic reviews in anesthesiology: a comparative analysis of top-ranked journals11 cited