SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewing manuscripts for behavior‐analytic journals: A primer
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Reviewing manuscripts for behavior‐analytic journals: A primer (2023)Reviewing manuscripts for behavior‐analyt…Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review (2022)Nobel and Novice: Author Prom…Single-case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades (2021)Single-case design standards:…Single‐case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and challenges (2020)Single‐case experimental desi…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2018)The Structure of Scientific R…The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The changing forms and expect…Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Reviewer bias in single- vers…The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. (2016)The Single-Case Reporting Gui…Rewarding reviewers – sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained (2016)Rewarding reviewers – sense o…Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Impact of interventions to im…Common and Intraverbal Bidirectional Naming (2016)Common and Intraverbal Bidire…Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Peer Review in Scientific Pub…Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers (2011)Reviewing Manuscripts for Pee…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance (2006)Effect of Blinded Peer Review…TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR INTERPRETATION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS DATA (1997)TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF STR…Tactics of Scientific Research (1960)Tactics of Scientific ResearchUS and Non-US Submissions (1998)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND EXTINCTION OF SELF‐INJURIOUS ESCAPE BEHAVIOR (1990)TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY (1994)WHAT MAKES EXTINCTION WORK: AN ANALYSIS OF PROCEDURAL FORM AND FUNCTION (1994)Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale (2001)AN EVALUATION OF PERSISTENCE OF TREATMENT EFFECTS DURING LONG‐TERM TREATMENT OF DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR (2011)Interpreting Kendall’s Tau and Tau- U for single-case experimental designs (2018)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement (2016)Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide (2017)Single-case experimental designs. Evaluating interventions in research and clinical practice (2018)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians (2017)The state of the art in peer review (2018)Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)The history of the peer-review process (2002)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2021)Toward a sustainability organizational culture model (2023)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions (2019)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention (2022)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Orientations in Language Planning (1984)The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct (2006)SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1 (1968)Statistical significance in psychological research. (1968)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2018The Structure of Scientific Revolutions1,966 cited
  • 1960Tactics of Scientific Research1,642 cited
  • 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review605 cited
  • 2014Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.399 cited
  • 2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance250 cited
  • 1997TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURED CRITERIA FOR INTERPRETATION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS DATA229 cited
  • 2016The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.219 cited
  • 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited
  • 2018The changing forms and expectations of peer review179 cited
  • 2020Single‐case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and challenges166 cited
  • 2016Common and Intraverbal Bidirectional Naming154 cited
  • 2022Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review146 cited
  • 2011Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers125 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016Rewarding reviewers – sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained124 cited
  • 2021Single-case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades110 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.