Socio-economic aspects in the management of enterprise personnel development

Abstract

The article presents the research results on the generalization and formation of the main features of socio-economic guidelines in managing the development of the company's personnel. The issue of the importance of social and economic guidelines in the management of enterprise personnel development was raised. It has been established that social guidelines include ensuring employees' safety and health, developing and supporting the work team, developing social guarantees, and developing corporate culture. Economic guidelines provide for the efficient use of resources, development and maintenance of competitiveness, formation of an effective motivation system, and optimization of personnel costs. It was found that motivation plays a vital role in personnel development management and is a complex indicator, the results of which depend on several variables. The enterprise's labor motivation system was considered a complete form of motivation organization. The indicators of the social and economic components of the motivation system are characterized. The methodological approach's main steps in assessing social and economic motivation are highlighted. The results of the motivational profile of the personnel of the enterprises are substantiated according to the needs: high wages, proper working conditions in a clear structuring of work, social contacts, forming and maintaining long-term and stable relationships, in gaining recognition, in achieving goals, in influencing people and the authorities, in changes and diversity, to be creative, in self-improvement, in interesting and socially useful work. The results of the personnel motivation system of the enterprises LLC AF "Viktoria", PJSC "Iskra" and SFG "Urozhai" were interpreted. Keywords: personnel management, personnel development, socio-economic management, motivation, enterprise, employee, management.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.