SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The CalculAuthor: determining authorship using a simple-to-use, fair, objective, and transparent process
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
The CalculAuthor: determining authorship using a simple-to-use, fair, objective, and transparent process (2023)The CalculAuthor: determining authorship …The authorship rows that sour scientific collaborations (2021)The authorship rows that sour…Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing (2020)Documenting contributions to …Authors overestimate their contribution to scientific work, demonstrating a strong bias (2020)Authors overestimate their co…Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science (2019)Misconduct and Misbehavior Re…Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…The effects of listing authors in alphabetical order: A review of the empirical evidence (2018)The effects of listing author…Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice (2018)Scientific authorship, plural…Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Recommendations for the condu…A Simple Framework for Evaluating Authorial Contributions for Scientific Publications (2015)A Simple Framework for Evalua…Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles (2013)Authorship Matrix: A Rational…An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing (2012)An empirical analysis of the …Best Practices for Allocating Appropriate Credit and Responsibility to Authors of Multi-Authored Articles (2011)Best Practices for Allocating…A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)A Systematic Review of Resear…A method for assigning authorship in multiauthored publications. (1997)A method for assigning author…Equity in authorship: A strategy for assigning credit when publishing (1994)Equity in authorship: A strat…A Suggested Procedure for Determining Order of Authorship In Research Publications (1985)A Suggested Procedure for Det…When Authorship Fails (1997)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How to do a meta‐analysis (2010)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017)Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals (2018)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship (2013)Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method (2015)Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)Publish or Perish: A Proposal (1986)On Authorship and Acknowledgments (1991)Criteria for authorship for statisticians in medical papers (1998)Qualitative methods for health research (2009)When Authorship Fails (1997)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective (2015)Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Survey of equal contributions in biomedical research publications (2020)Task specialization across research careers (2020)Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin (1994)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)Scientific collaboration (2007)Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies (2021)A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being (2022)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. (2002)Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas (2003)Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration (2018)Alphabetic order of authors in scholarly publications: a bibliometric study for 27 scientific fields (2020)Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit (2021)THE SCHOLAR'S COURTESY: A SURVEY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BEHAVIOUR (1994)Graduate Students and the Culture of Authorship (2006)Acknowledgments in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines (2014)Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)The AASPIRE practice-based guidelines for the inclusion of autistic adults in research as co-researchers and study participants (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals739 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication463 cited
  • 2011A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines418 cited
  • 2012An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing179 cited
  • 2013Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles137 cited
  • 1985A Suggested Procedure for Determining Order of Authorship In Research Publications89 cited
  • 2019Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science82 cited
  • 2020Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing78 cited
  • 2018The effects of listing authors in alphabetical order: A review of the empirical evidence59 cited
  • 1994Equity in authorship: A strategy for assigning credit when publishing59 cited
  • 2011Best Practices for Allocating Appropriate Credit and Responsibility to Authors of Multi-Authored Articles51 cited
  • 2021The authorship rows that sour scientific collaborations35 cited
  • 1997A method for assigning authorship in multiauthored publications.35 cited
  • 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Authors overestimate their contribution to scientific work, demonstrating a strong bias
33 cited
  • 2018Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice28 cited
  • 2015A Simple Framework for Evaluating Authorial Contributions for Scientific Publications27 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.