SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Strengthening a weak link: transparency of causal loop diagrams — current state and recommendations
16 references·0 citing·26 second hop
Strengthening a weak link: transparency of causal loop diagrams — current state and recommendations (2023)Strengthening a weak link: transparency o…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Depression as a systemic syndrome: mapping the feedback loops of major depressive disorder (2015)Depression as a systemic synd…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…Reporting guidelines for simulation‐based research in social sciences (2012)Reporting guidelines for simu…Group Model‐Building ‘Scripts’ as a Collaborative Planning Tool (2012)Group Model‐Building ‘Scripts…Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data: mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve (2012)Building confidence in causal…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models (2003)Collecting and analyzing qual…Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement (2001)Nobody Ever Gets Credit for F…Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models (1998)Expert knowledge elicitation …Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Practice of Social Research (1989)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)The Use of System Dynamics Simulation in Water Resources Management (2008)Synthesis of System Dynamics Tools for Holistic Conceptualization of Water Resources Problems (2012)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews13,845 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2003Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models508 cited
  • 2012Group Model‐Building ‘Scripts’ as a Collaborative Planning Tool338 cited
  • 2001Nobody Ever Gets Credit for Fixing Problems That Never Happened: Creating and Sustaining Process Improvement336 cited
  • 1998Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models301 cited
  • 2012Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data: mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

267 cited
  • 2012Reporting guidelines for simulation‐based research in social sciences245 cited
  • 2015Depression as a systemic syndrome: mapping the feedback loops of major depressive disorder207 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.