SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Orthopedic Journals: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
16 references·0 citing·32 second hopsampled
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Orthopedic Journals: A Meta-Epidemiological Study (2023)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristic…Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review (2023)Artificial intelligence to su…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019 (2021)Nearly 80 systematic reviews …Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers (2020)Protocol registration issues …Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report (2019)Study-based registers reduce …Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA (2019)Meta-analyses indexed in Psyc…Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Systematic review adherence t…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Meta-analysis: an update. (1996)Meta-analysis: an update.Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Scientific Utopia (2012)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,875 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,139 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,856 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data2,022 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research516 cited
  • 2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
  • 2021Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019285 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review160 cited
  • 2020Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

146 cited
  • 1996Meta-analysis: an update.123 cited
  • 2019Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA68 cited
  • 2019Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report62 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.