SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Perspective: Peer Evaluation of Recommendations for CONSORT Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Nutrition
11 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Perspective: Peer Evaluation of Recommendations for CONSORT Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Nutrition (2023)Perspective: Peer Evaluation of Recommend…Perspectives on the application of CONSORT guidelines to randomised controlled trials in nutrition (2023)Perspectives on the applicati…An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials (2022)An update to SPIRIT and CONSO…NUQUEST—NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies (2021)NUQUEST—NUtrition QUality Eva…Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence (2020)Improving the trustworthiness…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Perspective: An Extension of the STROBE Statement for Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): Explanation and Elaboration (2017)Perspective: An Extension of …Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research (2016)Perspective: NutriGrade: A Sc…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) (2018)Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research: meta-epidemiological study (2021)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Using risk of bias domains to identify opportunities for improvement in food- and nutrition-related research: An evaluation of research type and design, year of publication, and source of funding (2018)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)SPIRIT 2025 Statement (2025)SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict (2014)A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image (2015)Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey (2021)Exploring how researchers consider nutrition trial design and participant adherence: a theory-based analysis (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,165 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2016Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research359 cited
  • 2022An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials126 cited
  • 2017Perspective: An Extension of the STROBE Statement for Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): Explanation and Elaboration72 cited
  • 2020Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence71 cited
  • 2023Perspectives on the application of CONSORT guidelines to randomised controlled trials in nutrition27 cited
  • 2021NUQUEST—NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies24 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work