SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research Misconduct Investigations in China’s Science Funding System
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Research Misconduct Investigations in China’s Science Funding System (2023)Research Misconduct Investigations in Chi…Funding information in Web of Science: an updated overview (2020)Funding information in Web of…Temporal characteristics of retracted articles (2018)Temporal characteristics of r…Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats (2016)Funding acknowledgment analys…Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science (2016)Characterization, description…Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers (2015)Costly collaborations: The im…The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks (2014)The (lack of) Impact of Retra…Retractions (2014)RetractionsFinancial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Whither research integrity? P…The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)The Retraction Penalty: Evide…Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals (2012)Misconduct Policies in High-I…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…China's Research Culture (2010)China's Research CultureFalsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers (2008)Falsified papers in high-impa…Learning From Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed (1994)Learning From Oversight: Fire…Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms (1984)Congressional Oversight Overl…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Twenty challenges for innovation studies (2016)Research Handbook of Expatriates (2017)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1946)Job Market Signaling (1973)Strategic Information Transmission (1982)Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel (2006)Parliamentary Control of Coalition Governments (2010)The Institutional Basis of Democratic Accountability (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context (2016)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models (1999)The incidence and role of negative citations in science (2015)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)Social Choice and Individual Values. (1951)Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew (1975)Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment (1977)The Path to European Integration (1996)Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community (1997)Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work (2003)The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research (1998)Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology (2011)Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications (2012)The funding factor: a cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact (2017)Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles (2018)Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda (2022)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Analysis of retractions in Indian science (2019)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)General Belief in A Just World and Resilience: Evidence from A Collectivistic Culture (2010)World-class higher education and the emerging Chinese model of the university (2012)Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap? (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms2,936 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited
  • 1994Learning From Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed278 cited
  • 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science191 cited
  • 2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
  • 2013Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment171 cited
  • 2010China's Research Culture147 cited
  • 2016Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science119 cited
  • 2012Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals108 cited
  • 2018Temporal characteristics of retracted articles107 cited
  • 2008Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers100 cited
  • 2014Retractions91 cited
  • 2014The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks89 cited
  • 2020Funding information in Web of Science: an updated overview83 cited
  • 2015Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

83 cited
  • 2016Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats80 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.