Navigating Ethical Complexities Through Epistemological Analysis of ChatGPT

Abstract

This article undertakes an epistemological analysis to explore the ethical complexities of ChatGPT, an AI system. While ethical concerns regarding AI have received considerable attention, the epistemological dimension has been largely neglected. By integrating epistemology, the study aims to deepen our understanding of the ethical issues associated with ChatGPT. Four specific issues are examined: ChatGPT's role in testimony, its potential designation as an expert, the influence of user epistemic limitations and vices, and the impact of algorithmic bias on ChatGPT. The study's findings contribute to an inclusive comprehension of the ethical implications arising from the epistemological complexities of ChatGPT. They reveal the limitations of ChatGPT as a trustworthy source of testimony, attributable to its lack of genuine understanding. The blurring of boundaries between AI-generated information and authentic expertise is identified as a significant concern. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of addressing the epistemic limitations and biases of users to foster responsible decision-making and prevent the perpetuation of flawed knowledge. Finally, the ethical ramifications of algorithmic bias in ChatGPT are explored, emphasizing its impact on societal fairness and justice.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.