Using DMAIC for in-plant logistic activities improvement

Abstract

Goal: In-plant logistics activities are important for increasing the performance of the supply chains, so our research aims to study the application of Six Sigma tools for in-plant logistics activities in the cement industry. Our research contributes to the literature by developing a real case study that provides insights into the practical implementation of continuous improvement programs. Design / Methodology / Approach: This study uses the Industrial Case Study in a large cement plant, a branch of a multinational business group, in Brazil’s Middle-west region. This research applies Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) guidelines with Statistical Process Control tools for solving a real problem for out-control processes. From this, we propose an improvement plan to correct flaws in the in-plant cement loading and unloading process (in-plant logistics). Results: The results suggest that based on the control chart, the studied in-plant logistics activities were out of control. These processes exhibit a high variability, between 3σ and 5σ, presenting 26 problems with causes related to machine, measure, and human resources. An out-control action plan was proposed aiming for improvements to solve these problems. Limitations of the investigation: On the out-control action plan, this study presents an improvement proposal. The action plan does not fully develop the control step for DMAIC. Practical implications: Managers in the cement industry can use our case for insights and learning about improvement programs, especially for the in-plant logistics activities addressing processing-based manufacturing environments. Originality / Value: Our research contributes a real case study that applies the DMAIC methodology, with a specific focus on in-plant logistics activities. By developing the application of improvement programs within the cement industry, our study offers practical insights into how processing industries can effectively implement such programs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.