SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A Checklist Developed Using an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A Checklist Developed Using an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance …Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Investigating the replicabili…What are Delphi studies? (2020)What are Delphi studies?CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials (2019)CONSORT 2010 statement: exten…Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …Delphi Panels: Research Design, Procedures, Advantages, and Challenges (2016)Delphi Panels: Research Desig…Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement (2016)Consensus on Exercise Reporti…The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria (2015)Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,342 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
  • 2016Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement958 cited
  • 2019CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials779 cited
  • 2020What are Delphi studies?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

510 cited
  • 2016Delphi Panels: Research Design, Procedures, Advantages, and Challenges429 cited
  • 2021Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology419 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.