SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
From citation metrics to citation ethics: Critical examination of a highly-cited 2017 moth pheromone paper (2023)From citation metrics to citation ethics:…Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Publication and collaboration…How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science (2023)How bibliometrics and school …Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach (2022)Who are the 100 largest scien…Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)Protection of the human gene …The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation (2021)The right to refuse unwanted …The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The fight against fake-paper …Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…Do authors play fair or manipulate Google Scholar h-index? (2021)Do authors play fair or manip…Paper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics (2020)Paper mills and on-demand pub…Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations (2017)Quantitative and Qualitative …An Error is an Error… is an Erratum: The Ethics of not Correcting Errors in the Science Literature (2016)An Error is an Error… is an E…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis (2010)Detecting h-index manipulatio…History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences (2009)History of the journal impact…Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)Journal impact measures in bi…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics (1976)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Human behavior and the principle of least effort (1949)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts (2022)Discrepancies in Mapping Sustainable Development Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) Research: A Comparative Analysis of Scopus and Dimensions Databases (2023)Capacity building for organizational performance: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions (2024)Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis (2024)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)Reform retractions to make them more transparent (2020)Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence (2023)Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology (2023)A call for research to address the threat of paper mills (2024)An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing (2012)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future (2024)Journal of Global Health’s Guidelines for Reporting Analyses of Big Data Repositories Open to the Public (GRABDROP): preventing ‘paper mills’, duplicate publications, misuse of statistical inference, and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (2025)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Journal impact measures in bibliometric research574 cited
  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations379 cited
  • 2009History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences334 cited
  • 2010Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis309 cited
  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators292 cited
  • 2021The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science251 cited
  • 2023Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill101 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2022Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach64 cited
  • 2022Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills46 cited
  • 2016An Error is an Error… is an Erratum: The Ethics of not Correcting Errors in the Science Literature45 cited
  • 2021The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation37 cited
  • 2020Paper mills and on-demand publishing: Risks to the integrity of journal indexing and metrics31 cited
  • 2017Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

30 cited
  • 2021Do authors play fair or manipulate Google Scholar h-index?18 cited
  • 2023How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science14 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.