SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trustworthiness assessment as an inclusion criterion for systematic reviews—What is the impact on results?
5 references·4 citing·34 second hop
Trustworthiness assessment as an inclusion criterion for systematic reviews—What is the impact on results? (2023)Trustworthiness assessment as an inclusio…Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Methods to assess research mi…False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)False individual patient data…A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences (2020)A review of the current conce…Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology (2019)Plagiarism and data falsifica…Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Data fabrication and other re…Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study (2025)Investigating the impact of t…INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials (2025)INSPECT-SR: a tool for assess…Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project (2025)Assessing the feasibility and…Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)Research Integrity in Guideli…The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)Hundreds of thousands of zombie randomised trials circulate among us (2020)Publish or perish: Where are we heading? (2014)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future (2020)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed? (2023)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review (2020)Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers (2021)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review (2022)Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool (2022)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)New evidence pyramid (2016)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals229 cited
  • 2020False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia172 cited
  • 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
  • 2021Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review68 cited
  • 2020A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences57 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study39 cited
  • 2024Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis35 cited
  • 2025Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project28 cited
  • 2025INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work