SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting quality in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in high-impact dental medicine journals between 1993–2018
16 references·0 citing·37 second hopsampled
Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting quality in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in high-impact dental medicine journals between 1993–2018 (2023)Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting qualit…Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporti…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Systematic review adherence t…Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Evaluations of the uptake and…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Relation of completeness of r…Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Overlapping meta-analyses on …Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Evaluation of the Endorsement…Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analyses of Randomized C…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2021Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement3,479 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
  • 2013Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses881 cited
  • 2017Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review768 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

330 cited
  • 2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies248 cited
  • 2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.