Pandemic immobilities and consequences for commuting: Implications for mobility of COVID-19 mandatory telecommuting

Abstract

The immobility induced by the COVID-19 mandatory telecommuting has left its trail in how we commute and, more generally, move. Our research explores thirty individual experiences with “mandatory immobility”, from which three themes emerged: flexibility and perceived autonomy, social interaction, and cabin fever and physical and mental well-being. The results suggest that many will not want to return to the rush of everyday commuting after having had the opportunity to work from home. On the other hand, some will prefer to continue working face-to-face, perceiving the day as better structured in the office and, in some cases, specifically around the commute. The consequences for daily mobility are not straightforward, showing the importance of exploring individual circumstances, mobility preferences and motifs, which will impact the decision to telecommute or work face-to-face. Moreover, face-to-face work may be required if weaker ties within the company and with company values hinder productivity and innovation. However, if work-life boundaries and productivity are maintained, telecommuting may help with epidemic burnout and foster new mobilities.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.