SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Three of the Most Citable Periodontal Journals from 2018 to 2022
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Three of the Most Citable Periodontal Journals from 2018 to 2022 (2023)Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlle…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Influence of Reported Study D…Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals (2012)Assessment of adherence to th…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Randomisation to protect agai…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals (2010)An assessment of quality char…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2007)Randomisation to protect agai…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)How Well Are Randomized Contr…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (1989)Methodology and overt and hid…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Design of Experiments (1936)Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Meta‐analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co‐operative trials (1987)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods (2024)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1994)The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict (2014)A Meta-Analytic Review of Stand-Alone Interventions to Improve Body Image (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. (1993)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,172 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,861 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2012Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials1,047 cited
  • 1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
  • 2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors412 cited
  • 1989Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis338 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • 2007Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

189 cited
  • 2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
  • 2000How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature?126 cited
  • 2010An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals94 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.